|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
George Ross, January 25, 2009
Of course the 3.6GHz quad core system bests both the budget setups. The 3.6GHz quad core setup has a 41% lead in overall average FPS over the budget setup at stock speeds. Things look a lot better when the budget system is overclocked it manages to shorten the gap between it and the 3.6GHz quad core setup by 20% leaving only a 21% lead in overall average FPS for the 3.6GHz quad core setup.
If you are in the market for a new gaming system than you are in luck as current market conditions favor you the consumer. Here is something else to consider. Using the 3.6GHz quad core numbers as a reference you get 82% of the performance (when overclocked) of the 3.6GHz quad core setup with only 77% of the cost. Hopefully this guide has helped you if you are in the market for such things. |
This site is best viewed with a screen resolution of 1024 x 768 and up. | |
This site is powered by
|