Once You Know, You Newegg
  Home  
  Columns     Projects     Reviews  
  Contact Info  

SAPPHIRE Radeon HD 4850 1GB: Does Having Twice the Memory Make a Difference for the HD 4850?
George Ross, September 15, 2008



Introduction
Sapphire has released a version of the much touted HD 4850 that comes with 1GB of GDDR3 memory. We all no that more is better, but this is not always the case when it comes to graphics memory. For a $30 price premium you get two times the memory compared to your standard HD 4850. Now that some non reference HD 4850's coming down the pipe does Sapphire's 1GB version offer anything more than just the added memory? And does this added memory make a real difference in gaming performance? Let's find out.

Packaging and Contents
There is really nothing really worth noting here it comes in the same old box with the all usual adapters and such.



The Card
This card is just your basic reference design with a blue PCB and a bigger plastic duct/cover. The cooler is even the same, but it is not painted to look like copper. This does show what parts are actually copper. Witch is nice to know.



The memory modules are even arranged just like on the reference design. The only difference is they used higher density 1Gb memory modules instead of 512Mb modules.


Test Hardware
The two cards were tested with the 3.2GHz test system I've been using.

Processor Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 @ 3.2GHz
Motherboard FOXCONN P45A-S
Memory GeIL Evo One 4GB DDR2 1066 (PC2 8500) @ 480 MHz (DDR 960) 5-5-5-15 Dual Channel Mode
Hard Drive Seagate Barracuda ES.2 ST3250310NS 250GB 7200 RPM 32MB cache SATA 3.0Gb/s
Video Cards ASUS Radeon HD 4850 @ 625 MHz core 993 MHz (1986DDR) memory
Catalyst 8.8
SAPPHIRE Radeon HD 4850 1GB @ 625 MHz core 993 MHz (1986DDR) memory
Catalyst 8.8
Optical Disk Drive Pioneer DVR-215DBK
Operating System Windows Vista Ultimate x64 SP1

Gaming Benchmarks

Overall the 1GB HD 4850 had 1% less performance than the 512MB version. This is most likely due to the higher density memory having lower latencies. More memory less overall performance sounds about right to me?

Power Consumption
Power draw is about the same for these two parts. The 1GB HD 4850 idles 2W less, but 6W more than the 512MB version a full load. Odd don't you think?

Conclusion
As far as a RV770 and GDDR3 are concerned you are better off with the 512MB version for now. There is no pressing need for more graphics memory at this time. If I where in the market for an HD 4850 I would be looking at a card that had better cooling instead of more memory. The Radeon HD 4850 1GB from Sapphire fails to impress more than a reference HD 4850.

UPDATED When I referenced the latencies of the 1Gb modules I meant they could be higher than the latencies of the 512Mb modules. Sorry for my stupidity


This site is best viewed with a screen resolution of 1024 x 768 and up.
This site is powered by